FirePro W4170M vs RTX 1000 Mobile Ada Generation
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro W4170M and 6GB VRAM RTX 1000 Mobile Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX 1000 Mobile Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 125% (2025MHz vs 900MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
2176 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro W4170M
691
RTX 1000 Mobile Ada Generation
+1400%
10370
Graphics Card
Apr 2015
Release Date
Feb 2024
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
825 MHz
Base Clock
1485 MHz
900 MHz
Boost Clock
2025 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
96bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
20
384
Shading Units
2560
24
TMUs
80
8
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
Theoretical Performance
7.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
97.20 GPixel/s
21.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
162.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.37 TFLOPS
691.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.37 TFLOPS
43.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
162.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
35W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Opal
GPU Name
AD107
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1 (1.2)
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
6.5 (5.1)
Shader Model
6.7