Home Comparison FirePro W4170M vs Radeon E4690 MXM

FirePro W4170M vs Radeon E4690 MXM

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro W4170M and 512MB VRAM Radeon E4690 MXM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

FirePro W4170M 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock900MHz
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
64 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro W4170M +79%
691
Radeon E4690 MXM
384

Graphics Card

Apr 2015
Release Date
Jun 2009
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-II

Clock Speeds

825 MHz
Base Clock
-
900 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
4
384
Shading Units
320
24
TMUs
32
8
ROPs
8
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

7.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.800 GPixel/s
21.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
691.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
384.0 GFLOPS
43.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
30W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Opal
GPU Name
RV730
-
GPU Variant
RV730 XT E4690 (215-0729055)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
0.514 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
146 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1 (1.2)
OpenCL
1.1
1.2.170
Vulkan
N/A
6.5 (5.1)
Shader Model
4.1
© 2025 - TopCPU.net