FirePro W4170M vs Arc A530M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro W4170M and 8GB VRAM Arc A530M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Arc A530M 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 44% (1300MHz vs 900MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro W4170M
691
Arc A530M
+478%
3994
Graphics Card
Apr 2015
Release Date
Aug 2023
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Alchemist
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
825 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
900 MHz
Boost Clock
1300 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s
Render Config
6
Compute Units
-
384
Shading Units
1536
24
TMUs
96
8
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
192
-
RT Cores
12
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
Theoretical Performance
7.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
21.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.987 TFLOPS
691.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.994 TFLOPS
43.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
65W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
Opal
GPU Name
DG2-256
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G12
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
Unknown
77 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1 (1.2)
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.3
6.5 (5.1)
Shader Model
6.6
