Home Comparison FirePro V3700 vs T600

FirePro V3700 vs T600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro V3700 and 4GB VRAM T600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

FirePro V3700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 40W)
T600 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1335MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 15.20GB/s)
600 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro V3700
64
T600 +2570%
1709

Graphics Card

Aug 2008
Release Date
Apr 2021
FirePro
Generation
Quadro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
735 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1335 MHz
950 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
15.20GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
10
40
Shading Units
640
4
TMUs
40
4
ROPs
32
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

3.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
42.72 GPixel/s
3.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
53.40 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.418 TFLOPS
64.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.709 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
53.40 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
40W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV620
GPU Name
TU117
RV620 GL (215-0670004)
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
4.1
Shader Model
6.6
© 2025 - TopCPU.net