FirePro V3700 vs Arc A780
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro V3700 and 16GB VRAM Arc A780 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FirePro V3700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 200W)
Arc A780 's Advantages
Boost Clock2200MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (559.6GB/s vs 15.20GB/s)
4056 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro V3700
64
Arc A780
+28056%
18020
Graphics Card
Aug 2008
Release Date
Unknown
FirePro
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2200 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2200 MHz
950 MHz
Memory Clock
1093 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6X
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
15.20GB/s
Bandwidth
559.6GB/s
Render Config
2
Compute Units
-
40
Shading Units
4096
4
TMUs
256
4
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
512
-
RT Cores
32
64 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
Theoretical Performance
3.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
281.6 GPixel/s
3.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
563.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
36.04 TFLOPS
64.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
18.02 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
2.253 TFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
200W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV620
GPU Name
DG2-512
RV620 GL
(215-0670004)
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
TeraScale
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
4.1
Shader Model
6.6
