FirePro V3700 vs A2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro V3700 and 16GB VRAM A2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FirePro V3700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 60W)
A2 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1770MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (200.1GB/s vs 15.20GB/s)
1240 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro V3700
64
A2
+6979%
4531
Graphics Card
Aug 2008
Release Date
Nov 2021
FirePro
Generation
Quadro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1440 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1770 MHz
950 MHz
Memory Clock
1563 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
15.20GB/s
Bandwidth
200.1GB/s
Render Config
2
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
10
40
Shading Units
1280
4
TMUs
40
4
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
40
-
RT Cores
10
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
3.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
56.64 GPixel/s
3.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
70.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.531 TFLOPS
64.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.531 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
70.80 GFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
60W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV620
GPU Name
GA107
RV620 GL
(215-0670004)
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
55 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
Unknown
67 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
4.1
Shader Model
6.6