FirePro S7000 vs PG506 232
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro S7000 and 24GB VRAM PG506 232 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FirePro S7000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 165W)
PG506 232 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1440MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 153.6GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro S7000
2432
PG506 232
+324%
10320
Graphics Card
Aug 2012
Release Date
Apr 2021
FirePro
Generation
Tesla
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
930 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1440 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
3072bit
153.6GB/s
Bandwidth
933.1GB/s
Render Config
20
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
56
1280
Shading Units
3584
80
TMUs
224
32
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
224
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
24 MB
Theoretical Performance
30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
138.2 GPixel/s
76.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
322.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.32 TFLOPS
2.432 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.32 TFLOPS
152.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
5.161 TFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
165W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
Pitcairn
GPU Name
GA100
Pitcairn XT GL
(215-0828073)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
8.0
5.1
Shader Model
N/A
