FirePro S7000 vs FirePro V3800
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro S7000 and 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FirePro S7000 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (153.6GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
880 additional rendering cores
FirePro V3800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro S7000
+367%
2432
FirePro V3800
520
Graphics Card
Aug 2012
Release Date
Apr 2010
FirePro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
153.6GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s
Render Config
20
Compute Units
5
1280
Shading Units
400
80
TMUs
20
32
ROPs
8
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
Theoretical Performance
30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
76.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.00 GTexel/s
2.432 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
520.0 GFLOPS
152.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
150W
TDP
43W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Pitcairn
GPU Name
Redwood
Pitcairn XT GL
(215-0828073)
GPU Variant
Redwood PRO GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
0.627 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
104 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
5.1
Shader Model
5.0
