FirePro S7000 vs FirePro 2450 Multi View
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro S7000 and 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FirePro S7000 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (153.6GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
1240 additional rendering cores
FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro S7000
+7500%
2432
FirePro 2450 Multi View
32
Graphics Card
Aug 2012
Release Date
Jan 2009
FirePro
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
153.6GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
20
Compute Units
2
1280
Shading Units
40
80
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
76.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.600 GTexel/s
2.432 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.00 GFLOPS
152.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
150W
TDP
32W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x VHDCI
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Pitcairn
GPU Name
RV620
Pitcairn XT GL
(215-0828073)
GPU Variant
RV620 PRO
(215-0670006)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
5.1
Shader Model
4.1
