FirePro S10000 Passive vs TITAN Ada
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive and 48GB VRAM TITAN Ada to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FirePro S10000 Passive 's Advantages
Lower TDP (375W vs 800W)
TITAN Ada 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 165% (2520MHz vs 950MHz)
More VRAM (48GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.15TB/s vs 240.0GB/s)
16640 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro S10000 Passive
3405
TITAN Ada
+2628%
92900
Graphics Card
Nov 2012
Release Date
Unknown
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
825 MHz
Base Clock
2235 MHz
950 MHz
Boost Clock
2520 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
3GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6X
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1.15TB/s
Render Config
28
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
144
1792
Shading Units
18432
112
TMUs
576
32
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
576
-
RT Cores
144
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
96 MB
Theoretical Performance
30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
483.8 GPixel/s
106.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1452 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
92.90 TFLOPS
3.405 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
92.90 TFLOPS
851.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1452 GFLOPS
Board Design
375W
TDP
800W
750 W
Suggested PSU
1200 W
1x DVI
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
Tahiti
GPU Name
AD102
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
AD102-450-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.8