FirePro S10000 Passive vs RTX 6000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive and 48GB VRAM RTX 6000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX 6000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 164% (2505MHz vs 950MHz)
More VRAM (48GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (960.0GB/s vs 240.0GB/s)
16384 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (300W vs 375W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro S10000 Passive
3405
RTX 6000 Ada Generation
+2574%
91060
Graphics Card
Nov 2012
Release Date
Dec 2022
FirePro
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
825 MHz
Base Clock
915 MHz
950 MHz
Boost Clock
2505 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2500 MHz
Memory
3GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
960.0GB/s
Render Config
28
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
142
1792
Shading Units
18176
112
TMUs
568
32
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
568
-
RT Cores
142
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
96 MB
Theoretical Performance
30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
481.0 GPixel/s
106.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1423 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
91.06 TFLOPS
3.405 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
91.06 TFLOPS
851.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1423 GFLOPS
Board Design
375W
TDP
300W
750 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
Tahiti
GPU Name
AD102
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
AD102
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.8