Home Comparison FirePro S10000 Passive vs Radeon R7 360

FirePro S10000 Passive vs Radeon R7 360

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 360 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

FirePro S10000 Passive 's Advantages
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
Radeon R7 360 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 11% (1050MHz vs 950MHz)
Lower TDP (100W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S10000 Passive +111%
3405
Radeon R7 360
1613

Graphics Card

Nov 2012
Release Date
Jun 2015
FirePro
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

825 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
950 MHz
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
12
1792
Shading Units
768
112
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
16
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.80 GPixel/s
106.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.40 GTexel/s
3.405 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.613 TFLOPS
851.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
100.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

375W
TDP
100W
750 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Tobago
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
Tobago PRO (215-0875010)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.3
© 2025 - TopCPU.net