FirePro S10000 Passive vs GeForce GT 1010
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive and 2GB VRAM GeForce GT 1010 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FirePro S10000 Passive 's Advantages
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
GeForce GT 1010 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 55% (1468MHz vs 950MHz)
Lower TDP (30W vs 375W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro S10000 Passive
+352%
3405
GeForce GT 1010
752
Graphics Card
Nov 2012
Release Date
Jan 2021
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 10
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4
Clock Speeds
825 MHz
Base Clock
1228 MHz
950 MHz
Boost Clock
1468 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
3GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
48.06GB/s
Render Config
28
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
1792
Shading Units
256
112
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.74 GPixel/s
106.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
23.49 GTexel/s
3.405 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
751.6 GFLOPS
851.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
31.32 GFLOPS
Board Design
375W
TDP
30W
750 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 2.0
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Tahiti
GPU Name
GP108
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
GP108-200-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
1.8 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
74 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
