FirePro S10000 Passive vs FirePro W5000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive and 2GB VRAM FirePro W5000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FirePro S10000 Passive 's Advantages
Boost Clock950MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
FirePro W5000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 375W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro S10000 Passive
+168%
3405
FirePro W5000
1267
Graphics Card
Nov 2012
Release Date
Aug 2012
FirePro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
825 MHz
Base Clock
-
950 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
3GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s
Render Config
28
Compute Units
12
1792
Shading Units
768
112
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
32
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.40 GPixel/s
106.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.60 GTexel/s
3.405 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1267 GFLOPS
851.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
79.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
375W
TDP
75W
750 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Tahiti
GPU Name
Pitcairn
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
Pitcairn LE GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
