FirePro S10000 Passive vs FirePro V7770
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V7770 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FirePro S10000 Passive 's Advantages
Released 10 months late
Boost Clock950MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 33.60GB/s)
992 additional rendering cores
FirePro V7770 's Advantages
Lower TDP (76W vs 375W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro S10000 Passive
+240%
3405
FirePro V7770
1000
Graphics Card
Nov 2012
Release Date
Jan 2012
FirePro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
825 MHz
Base Clock
-
950 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1050 MHz
Memory
3GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR4
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
33.60GB/s
Render Config
28
Compute Units
10
1792
Shading Units
800
112
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
8
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
Theoretical Performance
30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
106.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.00 GTexel/s
3.405 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1000 GFLOPS
851.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
375W
TDP
76W
750 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Tahiti
GPU Name
RV770
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
RV770 XT
(215-0669049)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
5.1
Shader Model
4.1
