FirePro S10000 Passive vs Arc Pro A40
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive and 6GB VRAM Arc Pro A40 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FirePro S10000 Passive 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Arc Pro A40 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 79% (1700MHz vs 950MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 3GB)
Lower TDP (50W vs 375W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro S10000 Passive
3405
Arc Pro A40
+2%
3482
Graphics Card
Nov 2012
Release Date
Aug 2022
FirePro
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
825 MHz
Base Clock
1500 MHz
950 MHz
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
3GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
96bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
28
Compute Units
-
1792
Shading Units
1024
112
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
RT Cores
8
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
54.40 GPixel/s
106.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
108.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.963 TFLOPS
3.405 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.482 TFLOPS
851.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
870.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
375W
TDP
50W
750 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI
1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Tahiti
GPU Name
DG2-128
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
