FirePro M4000 vs Radeon R7 M265
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro M4000 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 M265 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FirePro M4000 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
Radeon R7 M265 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock825MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro M4000
+9%
691
Radeon R7 M265
633
Graphics Card
Jun 2012
Release Date
Jan 2014
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Gem System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
725 MHz
-
Boost Clock
825 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s
Render Config
8
Compute Units
6
512
Shading Units
384
32
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
8
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
10.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.600 GPixel/s
21.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.80 GTexel/s
691.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
633.6 GFLOPS
43.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
33W
TDP
Unknown
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
Chelsea
GPU Name
Opal
Chelsea XT GL
GPU Variant
Opal XT
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
123 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
1.2
Vulkan
1.2.170
5.1
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)
