Home Comparison FirePro M4000 vs Iris Xe MAX Graphics

FirePro M4000 vs Iris Xe MAX Graphics

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro M4000 and 4GB VRAM Iris Xe MAX Graphics to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Iris Xe MAX Graphics 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1650MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (68.26GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (25W vs 33W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro M4000
691
Iris Xe MAX Graphics +266%
2534

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Oct 2020
FirePro Mobile
Generation
HD Graphics-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
300 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
2133 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
LPDDR4X
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
68.26GB/s

Render Config

8
Compute Units
-
512
Shading Units
768
32
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
24
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
16 MB

Theoretical Performance

10.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
39.60 GPixel/s
21.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
79.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.069 TFLOPS
691.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.534 TFLOPS
43.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
633.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

33W
TDP
25W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Chelsea
GPU Name
DG1
Chelsea XT GL
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Generation 12.1
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
28 nm
Process Size
10 nm
1.5 billion
Transistors
Unknown
123 mm²
Die Size
95 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
© 2025 - TopCPU.net