FireGL V8650 vs T400 4 GB
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireGL V8650 and 4GB VRAM T400 4 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FireGL V8650 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.1GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
T400 4 GB 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1425MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
64 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V8650
440
T400 4 GB
+148%
1094
Graphics Card
Aug 2007
Release Date
May 2021
FireGL
Generation
Quadro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
420 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1425 MHz
868 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR4
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
64bit
111.1GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s
Render Config
4
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
6
320
Shading Units
384
16
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
16
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
11.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.80 GPixel/s
11.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
34.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.189 TFLOPS
440.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1094 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
34.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
30W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
R600
GPU Name
TU117
R600 V8650
(215RGIDKA13FG)
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
