FireGL V8650 vs T1000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireGL V8650 and 4GB VRAM T1000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
T1000 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1395MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 111.1GB/s)
576 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V8650
440
T1000
+468%
2500
Graphics Card
Aug 2007
Release Date
May 2021
FireGL
Generation
Quadro Turing
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1065 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1395 MHz
868 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR4
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
111.1GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
4
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
14
320
Shading Units
896
16
TMUs
56
16
ROPs
32
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
11.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
44.64 GPixel/s
11.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
78.12 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.000 TFLOPS
440.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.500 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
78.12 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
R600
GPU Name
TU117
R600 V8650
(215RGIDKA13FG)
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.8
