FireGL V8650 vs Radeon RX 6750 XT
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireGL V8650 and 12GB VRAM Radeon RX 6750 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon RX 6750 XT 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2600MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 111.1GB/s)
2240 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V8650
440
Radeon RX 6750 XT
+2925%
13310
Graphics Card
Aug 2007
Release Date
Mar 2022
FireGL
Generation
Navi II
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2150 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2600 MHz
868 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR4
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
192bit
111.1GB/s
Bandwidth
432.0GB/s
Render Config
4
Compute Units
40
320
Shading Units
2560
16
TMUs
160
16
ROPs
64
-
RT Cores
40
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
256 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
L3 Cache
96 MB
Theoretical Performance
11.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
166.4 GPixel/s
11.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
416.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
26.62 TFLOPS
440.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.31 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
832.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
R600
GPU Name
Navi 22
R600 V8650
(215RGIDKA13FG)
GPU Variant
Navi 22 KXT
(215-127000144)
TeraScale
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
17.2 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
335 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
4.0
Shader Model
6.5
