FireGL V8650 vs Radeon R9 Nano
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireGL V8650 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
Released 8 years late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 111.1GB/s)
3776 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V8650
440
Radeon R9 Nano
+1761%
8192
Graphics Card
Aug 2007
Release Date
Aug 2015
FireGL
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
868 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR4
Memory Type
HBM
512bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
111.1GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
4
Compute Units
64
320
Shading Units
4096
16
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
64
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
11.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
11.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
256.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.192 TFLOPS
440.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.192 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
512.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
175W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a
3x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
R600
GPU Name
Fiji
R600 V8650
(215RGIDKA13FG)
GPU Variant
Fiji XT CA
(215-0862120)
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
4.0
Shader Model
6.3
