FireGL V8650 vs Radeon R7 240
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireGL V8650 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 240 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FireGL V8650 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.1GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
Radeon R7 240 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock780MHz
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V8650
440
Radeon R7 240
+13%
499
Graphics Card
Aug 2007
Release Date
Oct 2013
FireGL
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
730 MHz
-
Boost Clock
780 MHz
868 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR4
Memory Type
DDR3
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
111.1GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s
Render Config
4
Compute Units
5
320
Shading Units
320
16
TMUs
20
16
ROPs
8
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
11.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.240 GPixel/s
11.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
440.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
499.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
30W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x VGA
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
R600
GPU Name
Oland
R600 V8650
(215RGIDKA13FG)
GPU Variant
Oland PRO
(215-0837015)
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
