Home Comparison FireGL V8650 vs MTT S30

FireGL V8650 vs MTT S30

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireGL V8650 and 4GB VRAM MTT S30 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

MTT S30 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1300MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 111.1GB/s)
704 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireGL V8650
440
MTT S30 +505%
2662

Graphics Card

Aug 2007
Release Date
Oct 2023
FireGL
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1200 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1300 MHz
868 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR4
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
111.1GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
8
-
SM Count
320
Shading Units
1024
16
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
-
RT Cores
-
L1 Cache
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

11.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
83.20 GPixel/s
11.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
83.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.325 TFLOPS
440.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.662 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
41.60 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
40W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

R600
GPU Name
MTT Gen 1
R600 V8650 (215RGIDKA13FG)
GPU Variant
TeraScale
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
Unknown
420 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.4
-
CUDA
4.0
Shader Model
6.5
© 2025 - TopCPU.net