FireGL V8650 vs GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireGL V8650 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1058MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 111.1GB/s)
1216 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V8650
440
GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition
+638%
3250
Graphics Card
Aug 2007
Release Date
Apr 2013
FireGL
Generation
GeForce 600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1006 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1058 MHz
868 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR4
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
111.1GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s
Render Config
4
Compute Units
-
320
Shading Units
1536
16
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
32
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
11.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
33.86 GPixel/s
11.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
135.4 GTexel/s
440.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.250 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
135.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
195W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
R600
GPU Name
GK104
R600 V8650
(215RGIDKA13FG)
GPU Variant
GK104-400-A2
TeraScale
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
