FireGL V8650 vs FirePro W600
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireGL V8650 and 2GB VRAM FirePro W600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FireGL V8650 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.1GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
FirePro W600 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 10 months late
192 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V8650
440
FirePro W600
+74%
768
Graphics Card
Aug 2007
Release Date
Jun 2012
FireGL
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
868 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR4
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
111.1GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
4
Compute Units
8
320
Shading Units
512
16
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
11.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
11.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.00 GTexel/s
440.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
768.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
48.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
R600
GPU Name
Cape Verde
R600 V8650
(215RGIDKA13FG)
GPU Variant
Cape Verde PRO GL
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
