FireGL V8650 vs FireMV 2400 PCI
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireGL V8650 and 128MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
FireGL V8650 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.1GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
320 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Aug 2007
Release Date
Jan 2008
FireGL
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCI
Clock Speeds
868 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR4
Memory Type
DDR
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
111.1GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s
Render Config
4
Compute Units
-
320
Shading Units
-
16
TMUs
4
16
ROPs
4
256 KB
L2 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
11.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
11.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.000 GTexel/s
440.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
20W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x VHDCI
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
R600
GPU Name
RV380
R600 V8650
(215RGIDKA13FG)
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Rage 9
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
130 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
0.075 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
92 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
9.0
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
2.0
N/A
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
4.0
Shader Model
-
