FireGL V8650 vs CMP 40HX
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireGL V8650 and 8GB VRAM CMP 40HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
CMP 40HX 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1650MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 111.1GB/s)
1984 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V8650
440
CMP 40HX
+1627%
7603
Graphics Card
Aug 2007
Release Date
Feb 2021
FireGL
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x4
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1470 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
868 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR4
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
111.1GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
4
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
36
320
Shading Units
2304
16
TMUs
144
16
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
288
-
RT Cores
36
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
11.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
105.6 GPixel/s
11.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
237.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
15.21 TFLOPS
440.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.603 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
237.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
185W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
R600
GPU Name
TU106
R600 V8650
(215RGIDKA13FG)
GPU Variant
TU106-100-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.8
