Home Comparison FireGL V8650 vs Arc Pro A60

FireGL V8650 vs Arc Pro A60

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireGL V8650 and 12GB VRAM Arc Pro A60 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Arc Pro A60 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 111.1GB/s)
1728 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireGL V8650
440
Arc Pro A60 +1808%
8397

Graphics Card

Aug 2007
Release Date
Jun 2023
FireGL
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2050 MHz
868 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR4
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
192bit
111.1GB/s
Bandwidth
384.0GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
-
320
Shading Units
2048
16
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
256
-
RT Cores
16
256 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB

Theoretical Performance

11.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
131.2 GPixel/s
11.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
262.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
16.79 TFLOPS
440.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.397 TFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
130W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 2.0
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

R600
GPU Name
DG2-256
R600 V8650 (215RGIDKA13FG)
GPU Variant
ACM-G12
TeraScale
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
11.5 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
269 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
© 2025 - TopCPU.net