FireGL V8650 vs Arc Pro A40
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireGL V8650 and 6GB VRAM Arc Pro A40 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Arc Pro A40 's Advantages
Released 15 years late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 111.1GB/s)
704 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V8650
440
Arc Pro A40
+691%
3482
Graphics Card
Aug 2007
Release Date
Aug 2022
FireGL
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1500 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
868 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR4
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
96bit
111.1GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
4
Compute Units
-
320
Shading Units
1024
16
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
-
RT Cores
8
256 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
11.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
54.40 GPixel/s
11.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
108.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.963 TFLOPS
440.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.482 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
870.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
R600
GPU Name
DG2-128
R600 V8650
(215RGIDKA13FG)
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
TeraScale
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
4.0
Shader Model
6.6
