EPYC Embedded 8324P vs Xeon 6766E
We compared two server CPUs: EPYC Embedded 8324P with 32 cores 2.65GHz and Xeon 6766E with 144 cores 1.9GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
EPYC Embedded 8324P 's Advantages
Higher base frequency (2.65GHz vs 1.9GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (128MB vs 108MB)
Lower TDP (180W vs 250W)
Xeon 6766E 's Advantages
Released 9 months late
Higher specification of memory (6400 vs 4800)
Score
Benchmark
Geekbench 6 Single Core
EPYC Embedded 8324P
+60%
1664
Xeon 6766E
1037
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
EPYC Embedded 8324P
+20%
13349
Xeon 6766E
11106
General Parameters
Sep 2023
Release Date
Jun 2024
AMD
Manufacturer
Intel
Server
Type
Server
Siena
Core Architecture
Sierra Forest
AMD Socket SP6
Socket
Intel Socket 4710
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
EPYC(Zen 4c (Siena))
Generation
Xeon 6(Sierra Forest-SP)
Package
35.5 billions
Transistor Count
-
5 nm
Manufacturing Process
5 nm
180 W
Power Consumption
250 W
-
Peak Operating Temperature
101°C
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
4x73 mm²
Die Size
-
6 nm
I/O Process Size
10 nm
397 mm²
I/O Die Size
-
CPU Performance
2.65 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
1.9 GHz
3 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
2.7 GHz
32
Total Core Count
144
64
Total Thread Count
144
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
26.5
Multiplier
19.0
64 KB per core
L1 Cache
96 KB per core
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
4 MB per module
128 MB shared
L3 Cache
108 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
2
-
AVX-512 FMA Ports
2
Memory Parameters
DDR5-4800
Memory Types
DDR5-6400
-
Max Memory Size
1 TB
6
Max Memory Channels
8
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes
Miscellaneous
5
PCIe Version
5
96
PCIe Lanes
88
