EPYC Embedded 8324P vs Opteron 43CX EE
We compared two server CPUs: EPYC Embedded 8324P with 32 cores 2.65GHz and Opteron 43CX EE with 4 cores 2.2GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
EPYC Embedded 8324P 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 9 months late
Higher specification of memory (4800 vs 3)
Higher base frequency (2.65GHz vs 2.2GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (128MB vs 8MB)
More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 32nm)
Opteron 43CX EE 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 180W)
Score
General Parameters
Sep 2023
Release Date
Dec 2012
AMD
Manufacturer
AMD
Server
Type
Server
Siena
Core Architecture
Seoul
AMD Socket SP6
Socket
AMD Socket C32
N/A
Integrated Graphics
N/A
EPYC(Zen 4c (Siena))
Generation
Opteron (Seoul)
Package
35.5 billions
Transistor Count
1.2 billions
5 nm
Manufacturing Process
32 nm
180 W
Power Consumption
35 W
TSMC
Foundry
-
4x73 mm²
Die Size
315 mm²
6 nm
I/O Process Size
-
397 mm²
I/O Die Size
-
CPU Performance
2.65 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
2.2 GHz
3 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
32
Total Core Count
4
64
Total Thread Count
4
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
200 MHz
26.5
Multiplier
11.0
64 KB per core
L1 Cache
192 K
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
4 MB
128 MB shared
L3 Cache
8 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
No
1
SMP
2
Memory Parameters
DDR5-4800
Memory Types
DDR3
6
Max Memory Channels
Yes
ECC Memory Support
No
Miscellaneous
5
PCIe Version
-
96
PCIe Lanes
-
