EPYC 4564P vs Centaur CHA
We compared two server CPUs: EPYC 4564P with 16 cores 4.5GHz and Centaur CHA with 8 cores 1.2GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
EPYC 4564P 's Advantages
Released 123 years and 4 months late
Higher specification of memory (5200 vs 3200)
Newer PCIe version (5 vs 3)
Higher base frequency (4.5GHz vs 1.2GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (64MB vs 16MB)
More modern manufacturing process (5nm vs 16nm)
Centaur CHA 's Advantages
Lower TDP (70W vs 170W)
Score
Benchmark
Geekbench 6 Single Core
EPYC 4564P
+211%
2445
Centaur CHA
786
Geekbench 6 Multi Core
EPYC 4564P
+284%
15303
Centaur CHA
3982
General Parameters
May 2024
Release Date
Jan 1901
AMD
Manufacturer
VIA
Server
Type
Server
Raphael
Core Architecture
CHA
AMD Socket AM5
Socket
VIA Socket 2084
Radeon Graphics
Integrated Graphics
N/A
EPYC (Zen 4 (Raphael))
Generation
CHA (CNS)
Package
13.14 billions
Transistor Count
-
5 nm
Manufacturing Process
16 nm
170 W
Power Consumption
70 W
100°C
Peak Operating Temperature
-
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
2x71 mm²
Die Size
195 mm²
6 nm
I/O Process Size
-
122 mm²
I/O Die Size
-
CPU Performance
4.5 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
1.2 GHz
5.7 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
2.5 GHz
16
Total Core Count
8
32
Total Thread Count
8
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
45.0
Multiplier
12.0
64 KB per core
L1 Cache
64 KB per core
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
256 KB per core
64 MB shared
L3 Cache
16 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
Yes
1
SMP
2
Memory Parameters
DDR5-5200
Memory Types
DDR4-3200
2
Max Memory Channels
4
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes
Miscellaneous
5
PCIe Version
3
28
PCIe Lanes
44
