EPYC 4465P vs Centaur CHA
We compared two server CPUs: EPYC 4465P with 12 cores 3.4GHz and Centaur CHA with 8 cores 1.2GHz . You will find out which processor performs better in benchmark tests, key specifications, power consumption and more.
Main Differences
EPYC 4465P 's Advantages
Released 124 years and 4 months late
Higher specification of memory (5600 vs 3200)
Newer PCIe version (5 vs 3)
Higher base frequency (3.4GHz vs 1.2GHz)
Larger L3 cache size (64MB vs 16MB)
More modern manufacturing process (4nm vs 16nm)
Lower TDP (65W vs 70W)
Score
General Parameters
May 2025
Release Date
Jan 1901
AMD
Manufacturer
VIA
Server
Type
Server
Grado
Core Architecture
CHA
AMD Socket AM5
Socket
VIA Socket 2084
Radeon Graphics
Integrated Graphics
N/A
EPYC (Zen 5 (Grado))
Generation
CHA (CNS)
Package
16.63 billions
Transistor Count
-
4 nm
Manufacturing Process
16 nm
65 W
Power Consumption
70 W
95°C
Peak Operating Temperature
-
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
2x70.6 mm²
Die Size
195 mm²
6 nm
I/O Process Size
-
122 mm²
I/O Die Size
-
CPU Performance
3.4 GHz
Performance Core Base Frequency
1.2 GHz
5.4 GHz
Performance Core Turbo Frequency
2.5 GHz
12
Total Core Count
8
24
Total Thread Count
8
100 MHz
Bus Frequency
100 MHz
34.0
Multiplier
12.0
80 KB per core
L1 Cache
64 KB per core
1 MB per core
L2 Cache
256 KB per core
64 MB shared
L3 Cache
16 MB shared
No
Unlocked Multiplier
Yes
1
SMP
2
Memory Parameters
DDR5-5600
Memory Types
DDR4-3200
2
Max Memory Channels
4
Yes
ECC Memory Support
Yes
Miscellaneous
5
PCIe Version
3
24
PCIe Lanes
44
