Data Center GPU Max Subsystem vs Quadro K5000 SYNC
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max Subsystem and 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000 SYNC to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem 's Advantages
Released 10 years late
Boost Clock1600MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3205GB/s vs 172.8GB/s)
14848 additional rendering cores
Quadro K5000 SYNC 's Advantages
Lower TDP (122W vs 2400W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem
+2317%
52430
Quadro K5000 SYNC
2169
Graphics Card
Jan 2023
Release Date
Jan 2013
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1600 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1565 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz
Memory
128GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
8192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
3205GB/s
Bandwidth
172.8GB/s
Render Config
16384
Shading Units
1536
1024
TMUs
128
0
ROPs
32
1024
Tensor Cores
-
128
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per EU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
408 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.59 GPixel/s
1638 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
90.37 GTexel/s
52.43 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
52.43 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.169 TFLOPS
52.43 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
90.37 GFLOPS
Board Design
2400W
TDP
122W
2800 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x SDI
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Ponte Vecchio
GPU Name
GK104
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Kepler
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
28 nm
100 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
1280 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
