Data Center GPU Max Subsystem vs Quadro FX 880M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max Subsystem and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 880M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem 's Advantages
Released 13 years late
Boost Clock1600MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3205GB/s vs 25.28GB/s)
16336 additional rendering cores
Quadro FX 880M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 2400W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem
+45098%
52430
Quadro FX 880M
116
Graphics Card
Jan 2023
Release Date
Jan 2010
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1600 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1565 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz
Memory
128GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR3
8192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
3205GB/s
Bandwidth
25.28GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
6
16384
Shading Units
48
1024
TMUs
16
0
ROPs
8
1024
Tensor Cores
-
128
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per EU)
L1 Cache
-
408 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
Theoretical Performance
0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
1638 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.800 GTexel/s
52.43 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
52.43 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
116.2 GFLOPS
52.43 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
2400W
TDP
35W
2800 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
Ponte Vecchio
GPU Name
GT216
-
GPU Variant
N10P-GLM
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
40 nm
100 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
1280 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.6
Shader Model
4.1
