Data Center GPU Max Subsystem vs Quadro 4100
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max Subsystem and 2GB VRAM Quadro 4100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem 's Advantages
Boost Clock1600MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3205GB/s vs 57.02GB/s)
15040 additional rendering cores
Quadro 4100 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 2400W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem
+2347%
52430
Quadro 4100
2142
Graphics Card
Jan 2023
Release Date
Unknown
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1600 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1565 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz
Memory
128GB
Memory Size
2GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
DDR3
8192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
3205GB/s
Bandwidth
57.02GB/s
Render Config
16384
Shading Units
1344
1024
TMUs
112
0
ROPs
32
1024
Tensor Cores
-
128
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per EU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
408 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.32 GPixel/s
1638 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.26 GTexel/s
52.43 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
52.43 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.142 TFLOPS
52.43 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
89.26 GFLOPS
Board Design
2400W
TDP
35W
2800 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
Ponte Vecchio
GPU Name
GK104
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Kepler
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
28 nm
100 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
1280 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
