Data Center GPU Max Subsystem vs GRID M40
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max Subsystem and 8GB VRAM GRID M40 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1600MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3205GB/s vs 83.20GB/s)
16000 additional rendering cores
GRID M40 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 2400W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem
+6511%
52430
GRID M40
793
Graphics Card
Jan 2023
Release Date
May 2016
Data Center GPU
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1600 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1565 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz
Memory
128GB
Memory Size
8GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
8192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
3205GB/s
Bandwidth
83.20GB/s
Render Config
16384
Shading Units
384
1024
TMUs
32
0
ROPs
16
1024
Tensor Cores
-
128
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per EU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
408 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
Theoretical Performance
0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.53 GPixel/s
1638 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
33.06 GTexel/s
52.43 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
52.43 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
793.3 GFLOPS
52.43 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
24.79 GFLOPS
Board Design
2400W
TDP
50W
2800 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
Ponte Vecchio
GPU Name
GM107
Generation 12.5
Architecture
Maxwell
Intel
Foundry
TSMC
10 nm
Process Size
28 nm
100 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
1280 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
