Home Comparison Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6

Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 and 4GB VRAM Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 24% (2050MHz vs 1650MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
3200 additional rendering cores
Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Flex 170 +467%
16790
Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6
2957

Graphics Card

Aug 2022
Release Date
Jun 2020
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1950 MHz
Base Clock
1395 MHz
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
14
4096
Shading Units
896
256
TMUs
56
128
ROPs
32
32
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

262.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.80 GPixel/s
524.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
92.40 GTexel/s
33.59 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
5.914 TFLOPS
16.79 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.957 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
92.40 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
50W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

DG2-512
GPU Name
TU117B
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
N19P-Q1-A1
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
12 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.6
Shader Model
6.6
© 2025 - TopCPU.net