Data Center GPU Flex 170 vs Quadro FX 380 LP
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 170 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 380 LP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Data Center GPU Flex 170 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
4080 additional rendering cores
Quadro FX 380 LP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (28W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Flex 170
+38059%
16790
Quadro FX 380 LP
44
Graphics Card
Aug 2022
Release Date
Dec 2009
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1950 MHz
Base Clock
-
2050 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
2
4096
Shading Units
16
256
TMUs
8
128
ROPs
4
32
RT Cores
-
16 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
Theoretical Performance
262.4 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.200 GPixel/s
524.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.400 GTexel/s
33.59 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
16.79 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
28W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
DG2-512
GPU Name
GT218
ACM-G10
GPU Variant
GT218 GL
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
40 nm
21.7 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
406 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
6.6
Shader Model
4.1
