Data Center GPU Flex 140 vs Quadro NVS 320M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 140 and 512MB VRAM Quadro NVS 320M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Data Center GPU Flex 140 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1950MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
992 additional rendering cores
Quadro NVS 320M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Flex 140
+5297%
3994
Quadro NVS 320M
74
Graphics Card
Aug 2022
Release Date
Jun 2007
Data Center GPU
Generation
NVS Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-HE
Clock Speeds
1600 MHz
Base Clock
-
1950 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
96bit
Memory Bus
128bit
186.0GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
4
1024
Shading Units
32
64
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
8
RT Cores
-
4 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
Theoretical Performance
62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.600 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
9.200 GTexel/s
7.987 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.994 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
73.60 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
20W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
DG2-128
GPU Name
G84
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
-
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
80 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
