Home Comparison Data Center GPU Flex 140 vs Quadro K5100M

Data Center GPU Flex 140 vs Quadro K5100M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 140 and 8GB VRAM Quadro K5100M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Data Center GPU Flex 140 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 153% (1950MHz vs 771MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
Lower TDP (75W vs 100W)
Quadro K5100M 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 6GB)
512 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Data Center GPU Flex 140 +68%
3994
Quadro K5100M
2369

Graphics Card

Aug 2022
Release Date
Jul 2013
Data Center GPU
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1600 MHz
Base Clock
771 MHz
1950 MHz
Boost Clock
771 MHz
1937 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
96bit
Memory Bus
256bit
186.0GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s

Render Config

1024
Shading Units
1536
64
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
32
8
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
4 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
24.67 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
98.69 GTexel/s
7.987 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.994 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.369 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
98.69 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
100W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

DG2-128
GPU Name
GK104
ACM-G11
GPU Variant
N15E-Q5-A2
Generation 12.7
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
157 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
© 2025 - TopCPU.net