Home Comparison CMP 170HX vs Radeon X1650 GT

CMP 170HX vs Radeon X1650 GT

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX and 128MB VRAM Radeon X1650 GT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
4480 additional rendering cores

Score

Graphics Card

Sep 2021
Release Date
May 2007
Mining GPUs
Generation
Radeon R500 PCIe
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1140 MHz
Base Clock
-
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1458 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
128MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1493GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

70
SM Count
-
4480
Shading Units
-
280
TMUs
8
128
ROPs
8
280
Tensor Cores
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
8 MB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

180.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.200 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
50.53 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
6.317 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

250W
TDP
Unknown
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA100
GPU Name
RV560
GA100-105F-A1
GPU Variant
RV560 GT
Ampere
Architecture
Ultra-Threaded SE
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
80 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
0.312 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
230 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
N/A
OpenGL
2.1
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
8.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
3.0
© 2025 - TopCPU.net