CMP 170HX vs Radeon RX 8800 XT
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX and 16GB VRAM Radeon RX 8800 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 624.1GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
Radeon RX 8800 XT 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 72% (2430MHz vs 1410MHz)
Lower TDP (220W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
CMP 170HX
12630
Radeon RX 8800 XT
+57%
19910
Graphics Card
Sep 2021
Release Date
Unknown
Mining GPUs
Generation
Navi IV(RX 8000)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1140 MHz
Base Clock
1295 MHz
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
2430 MHz
1458 MHz
Memory Clock
2438 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
16GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1493GB/s
Bandwidth
624.1GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
64
70
SM Count
-
4480
Shading Units
4096
280
TMUs
256
128
ROPs
96
280
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
64
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
8 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
L3 Cache
64 MB
Theoretical Performance
180.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
233.3 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
622.1 GTexel/s
50.53 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
39.81 TFLOPS
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
19.91 TFLOPS
6.317 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
622.1 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
220W
600 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1a3x DisplayPort 2.1
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GA100
GPU Name
Navi 48
GA100-105F-A1
GPU Variant
Navi 48 XT
Ampere
Architecture
RDNA 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
4 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
Unknown
826 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
8.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
6.8