CMP 170HX vs Radeon RX 6500 XT
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX and 4GB VRAM Radeon RX 6500 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
CMP 170HX 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 143.9GB/s)
3456 additional rendering cores
Radeon RX 6500 XT 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 100% (2815MHz vs 1410MHz)
Lower TDP (107W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
CMP 170HX
+119%
12630
Radeon RX 6500 XT
5765
Graphics Card
Sep 2021
Release Date
Jan 2022
Mining GPUs
Generation
Navi II
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4
Clock Speeds
1140 MHz
Base Clock
2310 MHz
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
2815 MHz
1458 MHz
Memory Clock
2248 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
4GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR6
4096bit
Memory Bus
64bit
1493GB/s
Bandwidth
143.9GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
16
70
SM Count
-
4480
Shading Units
1024
280
TMUs
64
128
ROPs
32
280
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
16
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
8 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
16 MB
Theoretical Performance
180.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
90.08 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
180.2 GTexel/s
50.53 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
11.53 TFLOPS
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.765 TFLOPS
6.317 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
360.3 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
107W
600 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GA100
GPU Name
Navi 24
GA100-105F-A1
GPU Variant
Navi 24 XT
(215-135000006)
Ampere
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
6 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
5.4 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
107 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
8.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
6.6