CMP 170HX vs Radeon Pro SSG
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro SSG to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 1 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 483.8GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (250W vs 260W)
Radeon Pro SSG 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 6% (1500MHz vs 1410MHz)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
CMP 170HX
+2%
12630
Radeon Pro SSG
12290
Graphics Card
Sep 2021
Release Date
Aug 2017
Mining GPUs
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1140 MHz
Base Clock
1440 MHz
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
1500 MHz
1458 MHz
Memory Clock
945 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
16GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
HBM2
4096bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
1493GB/s
Bandwidth
483.8GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
64
70
SM Count
-
4480
Shading Units
4096
280
TMUs
256
128
ROPs
64
280
Tensor Cores
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
8 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
180.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.00 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
384.0 GTexel/s
50.53 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
24.58 TFLOPS
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.29 TFLOPS
6.317 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
768.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
260W
600 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GA100
GPU Name
Vega 10
GA100-105F-A1
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XT GL
(215-0894124)
Ampere
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
7 nm
Process Size
14 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
12 (12_1)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
8.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
6.4