CMP 170HX vs Radeon Instinct MI350X
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX and 288GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI350X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Lower TDP (250W vs 1000W)
Radeon Instinct MI350X 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 56% (2200MHz vs 1410MHz)
More VRAM (288GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (8.19TB/s vs 1493GB/s)
11904 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
CMP 170HX
12630
Radeon Instinct MI350X
+470%
72090
Graphics Card
Sep 2021
Release Date
Jan 2025
Mining GPUs
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1140 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
2200 MHz
1458 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
288GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
HBM3e
4096bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
1493GB/s
Bandwidth
8.19TB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
256
70
SM Count
-
4480
Shading Units
16384
280
TMUs
1024
128
ROPs
0
280
Tensor Cores
1024
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
8 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
L3 Cache
256 MB
Theoretical Performance
180.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2252.8 GTexel/s
50.53 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
576.7 TFLOPS
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
72.09 TFLOPS
6.317 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
72.09 TFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
1000W
600 W
Suggested PSU
1400 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA100
GPU Name
CDNA Next
GA100-105F-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
CDNA 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
3 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
185 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
N/A
N/A
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
8.0
CUDA
-
N/A
Shader Model
N/A