CMP 170HX vs PG506 232
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX and 24GB VRAM PG506 232 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 933.1GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
PG506 232 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 2% (1440MHz vs 1410MHz)
More VRAM (24GB vs 16GB)
Lower TDP (165W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
CMP 170HX
+22%
12630
PG506 232
10320
Graphics Card
Sep 2021
Release Date
Apr 2021
Mining GPUs
Generation
Tesla
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1140 MHz
Base Clock
930 MHz
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
1440 MHz
1458 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
24GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
HBM2
4096bit
Memory Bus
3072bit
1493GB/s
Bandwidth
933.1GB/s
Render Config
70
SM Count
56
4480
Shading Units
3584
280
TMUs
224
128
ROPs
96
280
Tensor Cores
224
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
8 MB
L2 Cache
24 MB
Theoretical Performance
180.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
138.2 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
322.6 GTexel/s
50.53 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
10.32 TFLOPS
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.32 TFLOPS
6.317 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
5.161 TFLOPS
Board Design
250W
TDP
165W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
GA100
GPU Name
GA100
GA100-105F-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
7 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
N/A
N/A
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
8.0
CUDA
8.0
N/A
Shader Model
N/A
