CMP 170HX vs NVS 300
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX and 512MB VRAM NVS 300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
4464 additional rendering cores
NVS 300 's Advantages
Lower TDP (18W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
CMP 170HX
+32284%
12630
NVS 300
39
Graphics Card
Sep 2021
Release Date
Jan 2011
Mining GPUs
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1140 MHz
Base Clock
-
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1458 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
DDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
64bit
1493GB/s
Bandwidth
12.64GB/s
Render Config
70
SM Count
2
4480
Shading Units
16
280
TMUs
8
128
ROPs
4
280
Tensor Cores
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
8 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
Theoretical Performance
180.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.080 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.160 GTexel/s
50.53 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
39.36 GFLOPS
6.317 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
250W
TDP
18W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DMS-59
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA100
GPU Name
GT218
GA100-105F-A1
GPU Variant
GT218-670-B1
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
40 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
8.0
CUDA
1.2
N/A
Shader Model
4.1
