CMP 170HX vs GeForce GTS 250
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
4352 additional rendering cores
GeForce GTS 250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
CMP 170HX
+3163%
12630
GeForce GTS 250
387
Graphics Card
Sep 2021
Release Date
Mar 2009
Mining GPUs
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1140 MHz
Base Clock
-
1410 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1458 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1493GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
70
SM Count
16
4480
Shading Units
128
280
TMUs
64
128
ROPs
16
280
Tensor Cores
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
8 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
Theoretical Performance
180.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.23 GPixel/s
394.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
44.93 GTexel/s
50.53 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
387.1 GFLOPS
6.317 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
250W
TDP
150W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GA100
GPU Name
G92B
GA100-105F-A1
GPU Variant
G92-428-B1
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
55 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
260 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
8.0
CUDA
1.1
N/A
Shader Model
4.0
